Candidate models tested against the work your people, applications and agents will send, then turned into an infrastructure, placement and cost plan you can defend before you commit.
Most engagements open with a paid proof of concept, deliberately small.
One bounded workload and one measurable outcome, used to test the approach before the scope grows. Scoped to your requirements and quoted per engagement.
Six decisions, written down, with the assumption each one rests on beside it.
Assessment and planning does not require ARC. The recommended deployment is part of the decision, not a condition of the engagement.
A public ranking measures a model against someone else's tasks. Candidates here are compared on yours, across provider-hosted and open-weight options, on quality, cost, performance and deployment fit.
Where the plan calls for dedicated compute, that requirement is sized before anything is bought.
Sized against the volume, throughput and infrastructure assumptions the plan already wrote down. The number traces back to the evaluation.
FenxLabs negotiates the provider arrangement on your behalf. Providers publish very different rates for the same hardware, and they negotiate differently again.
Thirty minutes with an engineer. Your numbers. A straight answer.